extracontractual

the court ruled that the extracontractual liability rested with the manufacturer.

extracontractual damages were awarded to compensate for the foreseeable harm.

the company faced extracontractual claims from multiple affected parties.

some obligations remain extracontractual even after the agreement expires.

extracontractual responsibilities arise when parties fail to exercise reasonable care.

the insurance policy covered both contractual and extracontractual claims.

extracontractual duties are governed by tort law rather than contract terms.

the plaintiff sought extracontractual compensation for emotional distress.

several extracontractual relationships existed between the corporations.

the judge clarified the scope of extracontractual provisions in the ruling.

extracontractual obligations may exist under common law principles.

the court examined whether extracontractual liability applied to the situation.

negotiations covered both contractual and extracontractual matters.